SupportContactRequest Demo

vH₂O₂ vs other methods

How vH₂O₂ compares to formaldehyde fumigation, UV-C, and chlorine dioxide across key performance criteria.

CriterionvH₂O₂FormaldehydeUV-CChlorine Dioxide
Microbial Kill Rate6-log₁₀6-log₁₀3–4-log₁₀6-log₁₀
Aeration Time~1 hour24+ hours0 minutes2–4 hours
Residual ToxicityNone (H₂O + O₂)CarcinogenicNoneChlorite residue
Surface PenetrationFull — 0.25 nmGoodLine-of-sight onlyGood
Equipment Damage RiskNoneHigh (corrosive)NoneMedium
NATO ApprovedYesNoNoNo
Why not formaldehyde?
Formaldehyde achieves equivalent kill rates but is classified as a Group 1 human carcinogen by IARC. 24+ hour aeration requirements lock up production capacity. Regulatory pressure is forcing pharma manufacturers to migrate — DECX vH₂O₂ is the validated replacement pathway.
Why not UV-C?
UV-C is effective for line-of-sight surface disinfection but cannot reach hidden surfaces, ventilation systems, or equipment cavities. It cannot achieve 6-log₁₀ sterility assurance required for pharmaceutical isolators. UV-C and vH₂O₂ are complementary — not competing — technologies.

vH₂O₂ Microbial Resistance Scale

Full spectrum efficacy chart — bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, and spores. 6-log₁₀ reduction validated across all categories.

vH2O2 Microbial Resistance Scale — efficacy across bacteria, viruses, fungi, prions, and spores

Ready to eliminate
your bio-burden?

Request a free site assessment. We'll review your facility, existing decontamination protocol, and produce a validated cycle proposal.

Request Demo